Training
Training teams on the EU’s AI regulation.
The main format is a half-day in-house session, focused on the Article 4 literacy obligation: what the regulation requires, what it does not, and how to document it.
- Format
- In-house, on site or remote
- Duration
- Half a day
- Audience
- Non-legal teams
- Language
- French or English
- Handout
- Provided to participants
Formats
Main format Half-day
In-house training
The session described on this page: a half-day on the Article 4 literacy obligation, built around your organisation’s tools and uses.
Legal department Management committee
Framing session
A shorter working session with the legal department or the management committee: place the organisation on the regulation’s timeline and set priorities.
By invitation
Conferences and continuing education
Talks at conferences, seminars and continuing-education programmes, on the same subjects.
Four regimes. One question: where does your use case sit?
| Level | What it entails | Reference | Applicable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unacceptable | Prohibited practices: placing on the market and use are banned. | Art. 5 | 2 February 2025 |
| High risk | Enhanced obligations: risk management, technical documentation, human oversight, data quality. | Annexes I and III | 2027 – 2028 |
| Limited risk | Transparency obligations: inform people that they are interacting with an AI system or that content is generated. | Art. 50 | 2 August 2026 |
| Minimal risk | No specific obligation on account of the risk level. | — | — |
The Article 4 literacy obligation applies regardless of risk level — including to minimal-risk uses.
A summary reading. The exact scale depends on the consolidated text and the precise use case.
Who it is for
Business teams
Those already using an AI tool without having had to ask what the regulation says about it. This is the main audience.
Human resources General management
Because the obligation falls on the organisation, not the user. Someone must be able to show it was taken seriously.
Compliance Risk Data protection
To spread a common baseline across the organisation, rather than answering the same question ten times.
Firms Organisations
That wish to train their own internal teams.
Am I concerned?
Four questions are enough to place an organisation. The last one is the one that most often comes as a surprise.
- 01
Does your organisation use an AI system in its activity?
Including a tool acquired from a third party, embedded in business software, or used by a single team.
ThenYou are most likely a “deployer” within the meaning of the regulation.
- 02
Do you develop, or have developed, an AI system placed on the market under your name?
Including by reusing an existing model that you adapt and distribute.
ThenYou are then a “provider”, with a heavier set of obligations.
- 03
Are you established outside the European Union?
The regulation applies as soon as the system is placed on the market in the Union, or its outputs are used there.
ThenBeing established outside the EU does not exempt you.
- 04
Does your use case fall under minimal risk?
This is the case for the vast majority of everyday uses.
ThenThe Article 4 literacy obligation still applies. This is the point most often missed.
If you answered yes to the first question, Article 4 already concerns you.
Indicative reasoning. Does not constitute legal advice.
What we cover
Art. 3 · Art. 4 Definitions
What the regulation says
The scope, the provider and deployer roles, and what Article 4 actually requires — without over-interpretation.
Cases drawn from your activity
Recognising an AI system
Distinguishing what falls under the regulation from what does not. The exercise is done on your own tools, not on abstract examples.
Art. 5 · Annexes I & III Art. 50
Placing a use on the risk scale
Prohibited practices, high risk, transparency obligations. Knowing where a given use falls, and what follows.
Records Proportionality
Documenting the approach
What it is reasonable to record to show the obligation was taken seriously, in proportion to the uses.
Pricing not yet set. The vocational-training funding framework (Qualiopi certification and OPCO funding in France; training vouchers and paid educational leave in Belgium) must be verified before being announced.